Updated April 4, 2019
Chelsea has been let out of her solitary confinement conditions (Administrative Segregation), the definition of which, is nearly identical to the UN Special Rapporteur on torture’s definition of solitary confinement.
She is still being held on contempt charges and is awaiting the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals to rule on the bail motion her team filed on April 1, 2019. The defense will respond to both motions (the Appeal itself and the Bail Motion for Chelsea’s Release, pending the appeal) on April 9th, 2019.
Here’s VICE covering the story of her release:
More details soon, as things develop – and we will re-index this page soon!
|To keep up with developments, please follow the Chelsea Resists Twitter feed here. Donate to her Legal Fund here.|
Chelsea is being held in solitary confinement. See the definition of solitary confinement compared to the jail’s own definition of the “Administrative Segregation” conditions under which Chelsea is being held:
Still pretty fresh:
- Chelsea Manning’s Lawyers Say No Formal Accusation She Gave False Statements During Court Martial (By Dell Cameron For Gizmodo)
- Court Unseals Documents Regarding Chelsea Manning Subpoena (Documents are available via Lawfareblog)
- Chelsea’s March 8th Statement
- Chelsea’s March 7th Statement
- Daniel Ellsberg on Democracy Now: Chelsea Should Be Released
- Video of Chelsea Speaking outside the courtroom on March 8th – before her contempt hearing on Friday, March 8, 2019, when she was taken into Federal Custody. (via Ford Fischer / News2Share)
- Chelsea Resists Legal Defense Fund
- Chelsea Resists Twitter feed
- Address for writing Chelsea in Jail
- Dos and Don’ts for Writing Chelsea in Jail (IMPORTANT)
- Daniel Ellsberg’s Statement of Support via the Freedom of the Press Foundation
- Daniel Ellsberg on Democracy Now (Video)
- Glenn Greenwald on Democracy Now (Video)
- References (Accurate Press Articles)
Chelsea’s statement March 8th (from her Twitter account):
** Chelsea was taken into custody today for resisting a grand jury in the Eastern District of Virginia
Chelsea provided the following statement: pic.twitter.com/tWjEOFyhYn
— Chelsea E. Manning (@xychelsea) March 8, 2019
“I will not comply with this, or any other grand jury. Imprisoning me for my refusal to answer questions only subjects me to additional punishment for my repeatedly-stated ethical objections to the grand jury system.
The grand jury’s questions pertained to disclosures from nine years ago, and took place six years after and in-depth computer forensics case, in which I testified for almost a full day about these events. I stand by my previous public testimony.
I will not participate in a secret process that I morally object to, particularly one that has been historically used to entrap and persecute activists for protected political speech.”
Daniel Ellsberg’s Statement of Support
From the Freedom of the Press Foundation website:
“Chelsea Manning is again acting heroically in the name of press freedom, and it’s a travesty that she has been sent back to jail for refusing to testify to a grand jury. An investigation into WikiLeaks for publishing is a grave threat to all journalists’ rights, and Chelsea is doing us all a service for fighting it. She has already been tortured, spent years in jail, and has suffered more than enough. She should be released immediately.”
Chelsea’s Legal Defense Fund here:
Chelsea Resists Legal Defense Fund: https://actionnetwork.org/fundraising/chelsea-manning-needs-legal-funds-to-resist-a-grand-jury-subpoena
Address for writing Chelsea in Jail:
Chelsea Elizabeth Manning
William G. Truesdale Adult Detention Center
2001 Mill Road
Alexandria, VA 22314
Dos and Don’ts for Writing Chelsea in Jail (IMPORTANT)
Statement from Chelsea Manning Regarding Grand Jury and Consequences Associated with Her Refusal – March 7, 2019:
“Yesterday, I appeared before a secret grand jury after being given immunity for my testimony. All of the substantive questions pertained to my disclosures of information to the public in 2010—answers I provided in extensive testimony, during my court-martial in 2013. I responded to each question with the following statement: ‘I object to the question and refuse to answer on the grounds that the question is in violation of my First, Fourth, and Sixth Amendment, and other statutory rights.’
“In solidarity with many activists facing the odds, I will stand by my principles. I will exhaust every legal remedy available. My legal team continues to challenge the secrecy of these proceedings, and I am prepared to face the consequences of my refusal.”
References: (work in progress – will keep adding to this)
1. Why Chelsea Manning Decided to Go to Jail in Protest, March 8, 2019, by Dell Cameron for Gizmodo https://gizmodo.com/why-chelsea-manning-decided-to-go-to-jail-in-protest-1833164311
“Manning, whose right to remain silent was supplanted as part of the grand jury process, was subpoenaed last month in the U.S. Justice Department’s not-so-sealed investigation into Julian Assange. Her defiance of this secret inquisition, however, is not about protecting the WikiLeaks founder at all.
Manning says she is resisting because she, like many other politically minded Americans, believes grand juries are an illegal instrument designed to aide prosecutors on fishing expeditions; a tool for stripping witnesses of their constitutional rights that has been historically used against peaceful political activists by men in power who would have them labelled “terrorists” and “enemies of the state…”
“Manning’s association with WikiLeaks nearly a decade ago was dissected in exhaustive detail during her 2013 court-martial, in which all manner of evidence about her brief contact with WikiLeaks, including the transcripts of their conversations, was presented. But now she is meant to regurgitate that story based on her own flawed memories while under the threat of prolonged incarceration if she finds any reason to refuse.
“We hope she changes her mind now,” the prosecutor, Tracy McCormick, told the Associated Press.
Although Manning is constitutionally protected from double jeopardy—from being charged twice for the same crime—her political right to silence has effectively been stripped away…”
2. Chelsea Manning Fights Subpoena — Showing How Federal Grand Juries Are Unaccountable Tools of Repression – By Natasha Lennard, March 2 2019 https://theintercept.com/2019/03/02/chelsea-manning-subpoena-grand-jury/
“Manning’s decision to fight her subpoena is an act of resistance against government repression and in defense of a free press.”